Mobile phone subscribers feel connected in an almost unbroken flow and, on the other hand, network managers optimize connectivity and handover. It is still the same world, the same network, just two views from two angles, except that the customers’ subjective perceptions of value influence the flow of revenues at their very source, deciding the fate of all competitors on the market.
There are two challenges for providers in this respect. Firstly, which data will best help them to understand what users really value? And secondly, if they achieve the right understanding, can their networks support “flow of value” as it is perceived by customers?
Most users have neither the capability nor the interest in measuring the quality of networks. However they do perceive network quality consciously or sub-consciously as they use it to interact with others.
Network quality from the user perspective is an impression based on experiences when interacting. In previous times, perceptions focused on call quality and then browsing quality became the predominant criteria. Nowadays network quality is measured mainly by the flow of social network activities.
On the customer front, the battle is won and lost on price, because real differentiation is difficult. We still live in a “one size fits all” era (or rather “three or four sizes fit all”). How much value does this policy create for customers? More or less one third of them is on the move, one third is indifferent and only one third has found a place that fits.
Within the huge flows of subscribers between operators, there are slight differences between countries and operators, but in essence the picture is so similar everywhere that it even might even seem to be a natural law.
However as the mobile internet is beginning to dominate society’s methods of interaction, demand is beginning to increasingly differentiate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *